The Tariff Shock: America’s Trade Deficit Surges, and What Happens Next

In partnership with

This Isn’t Just a Trade Story. It’s a Structural Reset in Global Capital Flows.

The $140.5 billion U.S. trade deficit in March, a 14% MoM spike, isn’t just a front-loaded surge of imports. It’s the market’s early warning signal that something deeper is breaking beneath the surface: a reassertion of protectionist doctrine in a hyper-financialized global economy.

If this sounds like a rerun of 2018, think again. This is bigger, broader, and far more coordinated. Trade policy is no longer about bilateral disputes, it’s about altering the flow of capital, investment, and industrial strategy under the guise of national security. It’s economic realignment masquerading as populist policy.

Gold hitting record highs

The price of gold keeps heating up. If the record-breaking year of 2024 wasn't enough, gold hit a major historic 2025 milestone by crossing the $3,000/ounce threshold!

Here are 3 Key Reasons:

1. Looming economic & political uncertainty

2. Increasing central bank demand

3. Rising National Debt - over $36 Trillion

So, could gold surge even higher?

According to a recent statement from Jeffrey Gundlach, famed American business man and investor… “Gold continues its bull market that we’ve been talking about for a couple of years, ever since it was down to $1,800.” He expects gold to reach $4,000/oz.

Is it time you learn more about precious metals?

Get all the answers in your free 2025 Gold & Silver Kit. Plus, if you request your free kit today, you could qualify for up to 10% Instant Match in Bonus Silver*.

Learn more >>

_{*Offer valid on qualified orders of Goldco premium products only. Receive up to 10% in free silver based on purchase amount; cannot be combined with other offers. Additional terms apply—see your customer agreement or contact your representative for details.}

The Trade Deficit: Misread Metric, Real Signal

It’s tempting to dismiss the March data as noise—companies beating the tariff clock, stacking up inventory. But look deeper. The composition of those imports — pharmaceutical precursors, critical electronics, capital equipment—underscores one thing: the U.S. is structurally dependent on global input chains.

That’s not a weakness. It’s how capital-efficient economies scale.

The obsession with “deficits = weakness” is not only outdated, it’s dangerous. In a fiat, reserve-currency world, trade deficits are the flip side of investment surpluses. Dollars go out for goods; they come back as asset inflows. You don’t get Silicon Valley, the Treasury market, and global dollarization without this imbalance.

But in the current political climate, nuance loses to narrative, and investors need to model for policy errors, not textbook logic.

Tariffs as Shock Therapy: A Costly Experiment

Trump’s tariff expansion is no longer about leverage—it’s about architecture. This is industrial policy by blunt force. The mechanics:

• Inflation Reignited: Input costs are rising again, just as the Fed was preparing for a controlled disinflationary glide path. Core PCE will likely spike by early summer. Rate cuts? Off the table.

• Retaliation Risk Underpriced: The EU’s €100B retaliation threat is real. Japan and South Korea are exploring sectoral barriers. The U.S. is walking into a coordinated, multi-front trade pushback.

• Capital Spending Freeze: Corporate treasurers now face a moving regulatory and cost landscape. This stalls capex, delays M&A, and compresses margin forecasts across manufacturing, logistics, and industrial tech.

We’ve seen this play before: tariffs create short-term headline gains in factory jobs, followed by long-term distortions in productivity, pricing, and asset allocation. Investors betting on a resurgence of 20th-century manufacturing will be left holding the bag—again.

The Inventory Cliff: Recessionary Math Ahead

March's surge in imports = Q2’s drag on GDP. The math is inescapable:

• Inventory buildups add to GDP temporarily (via final demand).

• When they reverse, they subtract—sharply.

Expect a mechanical drop in Q2 and Q3 growth as firms throttle orders, work through excess, and pass along tariff-related price hikes to consumers. This is not organic slowing, it’s policy-induced deceleration.

Bond markets are mispricing this. The 10Y yield hovering near 4.75% implies confidence in Fed resolve. That’s misplaced. The next shock isn’t monetary—it’s supply-chain fragmentation and cost-push inflation reaccelerating against softening real demand.

Misunderstanding the Deficit = Mispricing the Future

Let’s kill the myth: a trade deficit is not a loss. It’s a balance sheet entry—imports financed by asset sales or capital inflows. The U.S. runs a surplus in:

• Services (finance, education, IP)

• Investment (inbound capital)

• Trust (rule of law, dollar liquidity)

These are strategic moats. Sacrificing them for the optics of “made in America” is not a policy victory—it’s strategic self-harm.

If tariffs reduce the goods deficit but deter foreign investment, erode productivity, and weaken the dollar’s collateral function, the net effect is negative—regardless of how it looks in an election year.

Market Opportunities: Where to Look, Where to Hide

This policy shift isn’t a one-off—it’s a structural driver. That means investors must reposition:

Tactical Defensive Plays

• Logistics & Freight: Expect short-term pain. Q2 will expose weak operators. Look to scale players with variable cost models and high asset turnover.

• Aerospace & Autos: Exposed to EU/Asia retaliation. Tighten risk models around global revenue exposure. Surmount’s thematic screening can isolate firms with domestic demand insulation.

Spotlight: Strategic Exposure in Aerospace & Defense

While broad aerospace equities face short-term turbulence, defense-oriented subsectors offer a fundamentally different story: long-cycle government contracts, strong innovation pipelines, and geopolitical tailwinds.

Surmount’s Aerospace and Defense Strategy, built by Logan Weaver, filters for firms with high innovation scores and durable competitive moats. The strategy's long-term return profile—161.5% all-time vs. 51.78% for SPY, speaks to its resilience in macro-disrupted cycles.

Key Holdings: Lockheed Martin (LMT), General Dynamics (GD), Elbit Systems (ESLT), and Northrop Grumman (NOC)—firms with pricing power, defense contract stability, and global relevance.

Risk Profile: Moderate, with a Calmar ratio of 0.96 and annualized returns north of 24%.

If you’re reallocating toward hard defense assets that ride alongside national spending—not consumer sentiment, this strategy is compelling.

View the full strategy on Surmount to explore tactical allocations across U.S. and international defense equities:

Hard Assets & Real Value

• Gold remains strategic: At $3,370/oz, its momentum is driven by central bank demand and global hedging. Maintain disciplined allocations.

• Energy Infrastructure: Quiet permitting reforms and export security needs are setting the stage for U.S. midstream outperformance.

• Short Duration Credit: Floating-rate credit and treasury ladders remain a volatility buffer as rate policy stays reactive.

Closing Thoughts

We’re not watching globalization unwind—we’re watching it become less legible. Trade, capital, and talent still move—but through different pipes, under different terms, with far more friction.

For investors, this isn’t cause for panic—it’s cause for recalibration. The edge now comes from understanding the new frictions, not betting on the old flows.

Resilience isn’t just diversification. It’s strategic optionality.

If you're building capital strategies for the next decade, assume this:
Volatility is structural now. And in that volatility, pricing power, flexibility, and geopolitical fluency are the new alpha.