Jobs Rewritten, Gold Repriced, Fed Cornered

In partnership with

Topgolf’s Former President Has an Even Bigger Idea

Troy Warfield knows how to scale a sport. As President of Topgolf International, he helped turn the concept into a global entertainment powerhouse, opening golf to millions of people who had never picked up a club before.

Now he’s bringing that same expertise to Surf Lakes as CEO. Surf Lakes’ patented 360° wave system can create 2,000 surfable rides per hour, across five skill zones, from beginners learning their first pop-up to professionals charging perfect barrels. This makes surfing accessible to anyone, anywhere, even far from the ocean.

With licenses already signed across the U.S. and Australia, and the first commercial park moving toward construction, Surf Lakes is primed to expand worldwide.

Topgolf made $1.8B in revenue in 2024, still going strong after two decades. This is your chance to join what could be the next global sports entertainment revolution. Invest by 9/12 and get up to 15% bonus shares.

Invest in Surf Lakes

_{This is a paid advertisement for Surf Lakes’ Regulation CF offering. Please read the offering circular at https://invest.surflakes.com}

Intro

If you feel like the macro plot keeps getting edited after release, that’s because it is. The government just admitted the U.S. added ~911,000 fewer jobs in the year through March than first reported. Markets shrugged and doubled down on rate-cut bets. Gold printed fresh records. And the Fed now faces a choice between protecting its inflation mandate or soothing a suddenly weaker labor narrative. When the scoreboard changes mid-game, pricing gets weird—and so does policy.

America’s Phantom Jobs: How We Lost 911,000 With a Spreadsheet

The down-revision wasn’t a rounding error. It was the preliminary benchmark—the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ annual process of reconciling the monthly payroll survey with unemployment-insurance tax records. Translation: survey guesses get tethered to hard payroll filings once the lagging administrative data arrive. Every year the process re-benchmarks nearly two years of data; big swings happen when the “birth-death” model overestimates new business formation. This time, it looks like it did.

Which sectors took it on the chin? Information, trade/transport, and parts of leisure—exactly where higher financing costs, automation, and post-pandemic normalization bite first. The headline: the labor market was softening before the latest tariff volleys. That matters for attribution—and for the Fed.

Background, because context beats spin:

• Why revisions happen: The monthly survey (CES) has response-rate issues and must estimate new firms; once tax data (QCEW) catch up, the BLS snaps the series back to reality.

• Why they’re big now: Post-pandemic firm churn plus lower response rates can magnify model error. When the economy’s composition changes fast, the old priors break.

• What’s next: The final benchmark isn’t until early 2026. Between now and then, every macro chart you see is carrying a ghost print from the missing-jobs year.

Politically, this is dynamite. Fire-the-ref rhetoric is loud; confidence in the scoreboard is low. But the plumbing is the plumbing. The method is standard; the scale is the story.

Cut Me Once: The Fed’s Dilemma When 3% Is the ‘New 2%

Futures markets have penciled in a cut next week—25 bps as base case, with some whispering 50 bps. A prominent Fed governor has already sketched a path for multiple trims over the next few months, arguing the labor data justify starting now. The pushback from hawks: easing into sticky inflation risks cementing 3% as the de-facto target. That’s not a soft landing; that’s a target drift without the memo.

Here’s the sequencing problem. The Fed will set policy with one fresh inflation print and a backward-looking jobs reset. If the CPI mix hasn’t cooled where it matters—core services ex-shelter, wage-sensitive categories, insurance—then a cut looks less like “data dependence” and more like a pressure valve for markets and politics. The risk isn’t just inflation; it’s credibility. Once the market believes the Fed will trade mandate for mood, term premia and gold don’t wait for minutes and pressers—they move.

Positioning amplifies it. Gold at records and a softer dollar say “policy put.” Equities already priced the cut; that sets up a classic sell-the-news if delivery is 25 bps with tight forward guidance. If CPI ran sticky, watch for the two-step: cut the policy rate, hike the rhetoric. That usually disappoints the momentum crowd.

Positioning Isn’t Policy: Why Rallies Built on Revisions Are Fragile

Revisions are rear-view; cash flows are windshield. If the Fed cuts because labor looks worse through March, while inflation is still sticky today, duration and gold can keep a bid—but high-multiple growth can wobble. That’s the asymmetry.

Background worth keeping in your toolkit:

• Benchmarking 101: Not manipulation—maintenance. The monthly survey is a thermometer; the annual reconcile is the lab test.

• Tariffs and wages: Broad-based tariffs raise input costs; wage floors are slow to roll over. That’s glue for core.

• The shelter saga: Official shelter inflation lags by quarters. If you’re basing policy on it, you’re driving with a fogged windshield.

• Liquidity math: Buybacks have slowed at the margin; households’ excess savings are a 2020-2022 story. When positioning is crowded and cash engines cool, air pockets happen.

The inconvenient truth: a cut can soothe credit and still pressure equities if multiples already front-ran easing. The first derivative (the cut) matters less than the second derivative (how fast the path is allowed to steepen). Guidance is the real policy here.

Strategy Spotlight: GLD-Tech Rotation

A macro-aware satellite sleeve for investors who want a simple, rules-based way to toggle between gold (GLD) and high-beta tech (TQQQ) as the market’s inflation/real-rate narrative swings. Horizon: weeks to months. Rebalanced daily.

Rule sketch

• Allocation engine: Allocate between TQQQ and GLD based on recent historical performance, increasing exposure to the relative outperformer.

• Risk control: If recent prices are >1.5 standard deviations from the 20-day SMA (Bollinger band signal), deploy only 50% of capital to reduce tail risk.

• Re-eval cadence: Rules re-evaluate daily; weights shift as relative momentum changes.

When to avoid
Choppy, mean-reverting tapes around event risk (CPI/FOMC weeks) that can trigger frequent flip-flops and transaction drag.

Sizing notes
Treat as a satellite, not a core. The exposure concentrates in two regimes (growth vs. gold). Pair with cash/defensive sleeves to soften drawdowns.

Why it aligns with today’s themes
When the policy path is questioned and credibility wobbles, the market toggles between “growth loves lower reals” and “gold loves credibility gaps.” This strategy systematizes that toggle without pretending to forecast the Fed.

The Takeaway

• Revisions are signal, not gospel. The BLS plumbing is legit; the magnitude is the outlier. Policy set on backward-looking weakness risks forward-looking mistakes.

• Credibility gap opens. Cutting into sticky CPI looks like target drift. Gold has already voted.

• Positioning > policy on impact. With a cut priced, delivery risk dominates. “Cut + hawkish guide” is how rallies stumble.

• Follow the clean tells. Dollar, long real yields, and gold will speak clearer than the post-game press conference.

• Next catalysts: CPI internals (services ex-shelter, insurance), labor cost indices, and September’s statement language around “balance of risks.” One cut doesn’t end the story; it begins the credibility chapter

Educational only; not investment, tax, or legal advice. Markets change fast; size prudently and diversify.